Calculate your Sovereignty Score™
Move the six sliders following the question for each dimension. The composite score and its breakdown update in real time. No data leaves your browser — the calculation runs entirely client-side.
ACF-1218%Decision identifiability
For every consequential decision the agent makes, can you name — instantly — the human individual or governing body who carries responsibility?
0 = no one is named, 100 = a DDAO is formally designated and reachable for every agent in production.
ACF-0618%Override capability
Can a single human override or reverse a specific agent decision in a bounded time (under 1 hour for critical, under 24 hours for non-critical)?
0 = the agent acts irreversibly on real assets, 100 = every decision is reversible by a single DDAO within SLA.
ACF-0818%Audit traceability
If a regulator asks for the full reasoning behind a specific decision made last Tuesday at 14:12, can you produce a cryptographically signed trace?
0 = no log, 100 = signed register with Ed25519 + hash chain + RFC 3161 timestamping.
ACF-0314%Threshold control
Are the autonomy thresholds (financial caps, action types, recipient lists) controlled by humans via documented governance, not by the agent itself?
0 = the agent sets its own thresholds, 100 = thresholds are signed off by the governance committee and locked.
ACF-0618%Kill switch effectiveness
Is the three-level kill switch tested in production every quarter, with the test result signed into the audit register?
0 = a button exists but has never been tested, 100 = L1/L2 drills every quarter, L3 annually, all signed.
ACF-1114%Drift visibility
Are model drift, case-distribution drift, and cost drift observable in real time, with alert thresholds owned by a DDAO?
0 = no drift dashboard, 100 = real-time dashboard with DDAO-owned alert thresholds.
Sovereignty Score™
/ 100
Fragile control
Breakdown
This tool produces an indicative estimate. For an opposable score signed by the DDAO and recorded in the register, use the acf.identify-governance-gaps tool from the MCP server.
What's next?
The score you just estimated is useful for an internal conversation (committee, CEO, CISO). To make it opposable — that is, signed by a DDAO and recorded in your organisation’s cryptographic register — two paths:
- Use the
acf.identify-governance-gapstool from theacf-mcpMCP server — it returns the score, the per-dimension rationale and the Ed25519 signature, ready to be recorded in the ACF-08 register. - Run a blind audit with an ACF®-certified organisation — see the Certification page (coming).